Evidence-first review Public claims only Not legal advice

Check a public AI product claim

Turn public AI claim wording into evidence requests, buyer questions, and safer wording for buyer review. Not a verdict, certification, or vendor rating.

Best path: paste one exact public AI claim. Add a URL only for source context.

Pasted wording appears in the receipt link. Do not paste confidential, internal, legal, security, PHI, or PII material.

Readable public pages only. No PDFs, login pages, private dashboards, or whole-site scans.

Receipt includes Evidence needed Buyer questions Safer wording

Use this checker when exact wording matters.

  1. Exact claim sentence

    Text only. Best when one sentence carries the evidence burden; only the pasted wording is reviewed.

  2. Public product URL

    URL only. Best when the claim is visible in readable public page content and the receipt should keep captured source context.

  3. URL plus pasted wording

    Text plus source URL. Best when the review should focus on pasted wording while recording the public URL without fetching or snapshotting it.

Do not paste contracts, security reports, PHI, PII, confidential vendor material, or private pages. The output is an evidence-burden note, not a legal, compliance, procurement, or truth determination.

Example Claim Receipt

Demo data only · not a real review · shows what a receipt looks like

Claim Receipt

Ref a3Kx9mZqLp Demo data

Evidence needed for wording High
AI-related claim
"Our AI is 98% accurate and fully automated."
Claim type
Accuracy / Performance + Automation
Evidence-burden note
High

Numeric accuracy claim without cited benchmark; absolute automation language with no human-review boundary stated.

Evidence needed
  • Test set, sample size, and evaluation method
  • False positive and false negative rate
  • Human review boundary
Buyer questions
  • What benchmark was used?
  • When does a human review the output?
  • How does accuracy change on out-of-distribution inputs?
Wording boundary
  • "Designed to assist review in defined use cases, with human oversight."
  • "Reported 98% accuracy on a named benchmark; performance may vary in production."
Vendor
Acme AI
Source checked
example.com/ai-product-page
Checked date
2026-05-21
Method note
Based on public page content and common claim patterns.
Disclaimer
Not legal, compliance, investment, procurement, or purchasing advice.
Corrections
Source update, company response, or correction? Send it privately for review →

Common questions

What this review is — and is not.

How is this different from ChatGPT or another general AI assistant?
A general AI assistant may help rewrite a claim. Check AI Claims returns a structured Claim Receipt with the claim wording, evidence to request, buyer questions, safer wording boundaries, and source context you can share with a vendor.
Is this legal advice or a compliance check?
No. The result is an evidence-burden note — it describes how much evidence a claim would require to support, not whether the claim is true, false, legal, illegal, compliant, or fraudulent. Final decisions should be made by humans with additional evidence and qualified review. Full disclaimer →
What happens to my pasted text?
Pasted claim text is used to generate the review and is not auto-published. The reviewed wording appears in the unlisted noindex Claim Receipt, so use public marketing claims rather than confidential material. Full pasted text is not stored in analytics. See privacy details →